SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

David Wanyonyi v Attorney General,Chief of Defence Forces & Army Commander Kenya Army (Cause 40 of 2013) [2015] KEELRC 324 (KLR) (6 November 2015) (Ruling)

[2015] KEELRC 324 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
324
Citation
[2015] KEELRC 324 (KLR)
Decided
6 November 2015
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeAppealPostureRespondents sought to set aside a judgment and order made by the Honourable Justice Ongaya on 17 October 2014, and to review the same.CoramOngaya
The Court dismissed the motion to set aside the judgment and order, finding that the Respondents had not complied with the terms of the judgment and had not presented a full case in their initial application for stay of execution.

Facts

The Claimant was ordered to be re-engaged or paid certain entitlements by the Respondents, but they failed to comply. The Respondents filed motions seeking a stay of execution and review of the judgment.

Issues

  • Applicability of section 5(2) of the Employment Act, 2007
  • Res judicata
  • Constitutional rights of members of the military

Reasoning

The Court found that the Respondents had waited for over 8 months before seeking review and had not presented a full case in their initial application for stay of execution. The Court also noted conflicting holdings by the Court of Appeal on the question.

Outcome

The motion to set aside the judgment and order was dismissed.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Employment Act, 2007
Cases cited (1)
  • Yat Tung Investment Co. Ltd v Dao Heng Bank Ltd
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case