SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Steve Onyari Nyambegera v Bake ‘N’ Bite Mombasa Ltd [2015] KEELRC 387 (KLR)

[2015] KEELRC 387 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
387
Citation
[2015] KEELRC 387 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeUnfair TerminationPostureOriginal TrialCoramThe presiding judge
Holding

The Court found that the Respondent did not comply with the peremptory requirements of procedural fairness, particularly in the process of informing the Claimant of the allegations and giving him an opportunity to make representations. The Court also found that the reasons given for the dismissal were not proved.

Facts

The Claimant, Steve Onyari Nyambegera, was employed by Bake ‘N’ Bite Mombasa Ltd from March 2010 until October 2013. The Respondent alleged that the Claimant used excess yeast in mixing flour for baking, inciting other employees to do so, and not adhering to procedures.

Issues

  1. When did the employment relationship commence?
  2. Was the dismissal of the Claimant unfair?
  3. What are the Claimant’s contractual and statutory entitlements?

Reasoning

The Court determined that the Respondent did not provide the Claimant with the necessary procedural fairness, as evidenced by the lack of a formal hearing and the absence of clear allegations and proof of misconduct. The Court also found that the reasons given for the dismissal were not substantiated.

Outcome

The Court found the dismissal to be unfair and ordered the Respondent to pay damages for the loss of prospective future earnings.

Orders

  • The Respondent to pay damages for the loss of prospective future earnings.

Remedies

  • Damages for the loss of prospective future earnings.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Employment Act, 2007
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case