Joseph Gidraf Wanjala v Diane Hamrick & another [2015] KEELRC 395 (KLR)
- Court
- Employment & Labour Relations Court
- Case number
- 395
- Citation
- [2015] KEELRC 395 (KLR)
- Decided
- 23 October 2015
The Court finds that the firm of Kiarie, Kabita, Kihunyu & Associates is the proper party to represent the 2nd Respondent in the employment dispute. The 1st Respondent is the employer.
Facts
Claimant Joseph Gidraf Wanjala was employed as Principal by United Methodist Mission Schools-Nakuru. He filed a lawsuit alleging unfair termination of employment. The case involved multiple legal appearances and disputes over representation.
Issues
- Who is the proper party to represent the 2nd Respondent in a complaint of unfair termination of employment?
- Who is the employer in the employment dispute?
Reasoning
The Court determined that the 1st Respondent, registered as the manager of the 2nd Respondent, is the proper party to represent the 2nd Respondent in the employment dispute. The Court dismissed the claimant's allegations of unfair termination.
Outcome
The Court dismissed the claimant's allegations of unfair termination.
Orders
- The firm of Kiarie, Kabita, Kihunyu & Associates is the proper party to represent the 2nd Respondent in the employment dispute.
- The 1st Respondent is the employer in the employment dispute.
Authorities cited
Legislation (1)
- Employment Act, 2007
Loading judgment…