SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Margaret Auma Ingwe v Kenya Power And Lighting Co. Ltd [2015] KEELRC 489 (KLR)

[2015] KEELRC 489 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
489
Citation
[2015] KEELRC 489 (KLR)
Decided
30 September 2015
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeReview of Employment and Labour Relations Court AwardPostureApplication for review of awardCoramLINNET NDOLO
Holding

The Court reviews the award and awards eight months' salary in compensation and four months' salary in lieu of notice, totaling Kshs.1,077,216.00.

Facts

Claimant Margaret Auma Ingwe was awarded compensation for unfair termination of employment and one month's salary in lieu of notice. The Respondent, Kenya Power and Lighting Co. Ltd., counterclaimed for Kshs.642,618.00. The Claimant filed an application for review on June 19, 2015.

Issues

  1. Whether the Court erred in awarding one month's salary in lieu of notice instead of four months' salary as per the Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA)
  2. Whether the Court's decision to award notice pay was based on procedural unfairness

Reasoning

The Court found that the termination of employment was procedurally unfair and awarded notice pay based on this finding. However, the Court inadvertently applied one month's notice pay instead of the four months' notice pay set out in the CBA, which constitutes an error apparent on the face of the record.

Outcome

The award is reviewed and the Claimant is awarded a total of Kshs.1,077,216.00.

Orders

  • Each party will bear their own costs.

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • Employment and Labour Relations Court Act
  • Employment Act, 2007
  • Procedure Rules
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case