SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kenya Airlines Pilots Association v Kenya Airways Limited & Jambojet Limited [2015] KEELRC 647 (KLR)

[2015] KEELRC 647 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
647
Citation
[2015] KEELRC 647 (KLR)
Decided
28 July 2015
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeInterlocutory InjunctionPostureApplication for Interlocutory InjunctionCoramHon. Justice Hellen S. Wasilwa
Holding

Interlocutory injunction restraining the Respondents from commencing or continuing wet-lease agreements to the specified locations pending further hearing.

Facts

Kenya Airways Limited and Jambojet Limited are operating wet-lease agreements with aircraft to fly to Lamu, Ukunda, Malindi, Kisumu, and Eldoret, which the Kenya Airlines Pilots Association claims are illegal and violate their rights.

Issues

  1. Validity of wet-lease agreements
  2. Claimant's recognition as a trade union
  3. Air Operator Certification (AOC) requirements

Reasoning

The Court found the wet-lease agreements to be illegal and in violation of the Civil Aviation (Air Operator Certification and Administration) Regulations, 2013, and the Labour Relations Act No. 14 of 2007. The Claimant is recognized as a trade union and has the right to consultation and concurrence in such agreements.

Outcome

Interlocutory injunction granted

Orders

  • Interlocutory injunction restraining the Respondents from commencing or continuing wet-lease agreements to the specified locations

Remedies

  • Interlocutory injunction

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • Civil Aviation Act No. 21 of 2013
  • Civil Aviation (Air Operator Certification and Administration) Regulations, 2013
  • Labour Relations Act No. 14 of 2007
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case