SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Sheila Caroline Ciiru v Sarova Stanley [2015] KEELRC 693 (KLR)

[2015] KEELRC 693 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
693
Citation
[2015] KEELRC 693 (KLR)
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeReview of Employment Court DecisionPostureClaimant/Applicant's application for review of Employment Court decisionCoramNzioki wa Makau
The Court finds the claimant's application for review valid and orders the balance of leave allowance, gratuity, 12 months compensation, and general damages.

Facts

Claimant was denied unpaid leave and suffered loss of salary and house allowance due to the Respondent's unfair termination, which she claims violated ILO Convention 158.

Issues

  • Correct tabulation of leave allowance and damages
  • Unfair termination and violation of ILO Convention 158

Reasoning

The Court acknowledges the discrepancy in the figures and the claimant's assertion of unfair termination.

Outcome

The Court upholds the claimant's application and orders the balance of leave allowance, gratuity, 12 months compensation, and general damages.

Orders

  • Orders the balance of leave allowance, gratuity, 12 months compensation, and general damages

Remedies

  • Payment of damages and compensation

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • Industrial Court Act
  • Industrial Court (Procedure) Rules 2010
  • ILO Convention 158
Cases cited (2)
  • Peter Onditi Ogugu v All Pack Industries & IPS (K) Ltd
  • Medek Sadik Okuto v Kenya Bus Services Limited
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case