SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Brown Tsuma Mukanda v National Gender and Equality Commission [2015] KEELRC 986 (KLR)

[2015] KEELRC 986 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
986
Citation
[2015] KEELRC 986 (KLR)
Decided
7 May 2015
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeInterlocutory InjunctionPostureInterlocutory Injunction ApplicationCoramAbuodha J. N.
The Court declines to grant the orders sought with the consequence that the application is dismissed with costs.

Facts

The claimant, Brown Tsuma Mukanda, was hired by the respondent, National Gender and Equality Commission, on 23rd November, 2012 for a period of 5 years. He was dismissed on 6th October, 2014 for what he considered 'without just reasons'. He appealed the dismissal but the appeal was heard by the same body that heard the notice to show cause. The claimant was issued a warning letter on 10th July, 2014, which was to remain in force for six months, but no third warning letter was issued.

Issues

  • Whether the respondent's decision to terminate the claimant's employment was in accordance with the Employment Act and rules of natural justice.
  • Whether the claimant's dismissal was in gross violation of the contract employment, the Employment Act, and rules of natural justice.

Reasoning

The Court is not persuaded that the claimant has demonstrated that damages would not be an adequate remedy. The dismissal was not in gross violation of the contract employment, the Employment Act, and rules of natural justice.

Outcome

Application dismissed with costs.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • NGEC Act
  • Employment Act
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case