SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Elias Mudaki Ngaywa v Principal Secretary Ministry of Tourism & another [2016] KEELRC 111 (KLR)

[2016] KEELRC 111 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
111
Citation
[2016] KEELRC 111 (KLR)
Decided
20 December 2016
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeLabor DisputePostureRespondent raised preliminary objections to the Claimant's claim.CoramLINNET NDOLO
The issues raised in the current claim are res judicata and cannot be reopened for retrial.

Facts

The Claimant filed CMCC No 2648 of 2006 seeking a determination of wrongful termination, while in the current case, he seeks reinstatement.

Issues

  • Whether the issues raised in the current claim are res judicata.
  • Whether the suit is time barred and offends the provisions of Section 90 of the Employment Act, 2007.

Reasoning

The Court of Appeal held that the doctrine of res judicata is grounded on public policy and aimed at assuring finality to litigation. Section 7 of the Civil Procedure Act bars a court from trying a suit whose subject matter has been substantially litigated upon by the same parties and finally determined by a court of competent jurisdiction.

Outcome

The Claimant's claim is struck out with no order for costs.

Orders

  • The Claimant's claim is struck out with no order for costs.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Employment Act, 2007
  • Civil Procedure Act
Cases cited (1)
  • Nicholas Njeru v Attorney General & 8 Others [2013] eKLR
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case