SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Humphrey Mukundi Mwangi v Bradegate Holdings Limited [2017] KEELRC 1005 (KLR)

[2017] KEELRC 1005 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
1005
Citation
[2017] KEELRC 1005 (KLR)
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeUnfair DismissalPostureClaimant vs RespondentCoramBYRAM ONGAYA
The termination was unfair, and the claimant is awarded 12 months' salary, one month's pay in lieu of notice, and annual leave pay.

Facts

Claimant Humphrey Mukundi Mwangi was employed as a Group General Manager by Respondent Bradegate Holdings Limited from September 17, 2013. On October 18, 2015, the Chairman verbally dismissed him without notice or a hearing, and the claimant did not receive a formal termination letter.

Issues

  • Whether the claimant's termination was unfair
  • Whether the claimant is entitled to the remedies prayed for

Reasoning

The court found the dismissal to be unfair due to the lack of notice, hearing, and valid reason, and the humiliation and intimidation faced by the claimant.

Outcome

Judgment in favor of the claimant

Orders

  • Respondent to pay claimant Kshs.2,320,881.46 by 01.10.2017
  • Respondent to deliver certificate of service by 01.09.2017
  • Claimant to be declared as having been unfairly dismissed
  • Respondent to pay claimant's costs of the suit

Remedies

  • 12 months' salary
  • One month's pay in lieu of notice
  • Annual leave pay

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Employment Act, 2007
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case