SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

George Okono v Little Chef Holdings Limited [2017] KEELRC 1190 (KLR)

[2017] KEELRC 1190 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
1190
Citation
[2017] KEELRC 1190 (KLR)
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeEmployment DisputePostureClaimant's AppealCoramJames Rika
Claimant is entitled to compensation for unfair termination and other arrears.

Facts

Claimant George Okono was employed by Respondent Little Chef Holdings Limited as Supervisor in 2006. He was dismissed in September 2013 without notice or just cause. The Claimant claimed arrears of salary, salary in lieu of notice, house allowance, public holidays pay, and compensation for unfair termination.

Issues

  • Termination was unfair.
  • House rent allowance and public holidays pay are allowed.
  • Compensation for unfair termination is granted.

Reasoning

The Court found termination was unfair and allowed the claims for arrears of salary, house rent allowance, and public holidays pay. Compensation for unfair termination is granted.

Outcome

Claimant wins.

Orders

  • Arrears of salary at Kshs. 36,000.
  • Notice pay at Kshs. 18,000.
  • Arrears of house rent allowance at Kshs. 226,800.
  • Compensation for unfair termination at Kshs. 144,900.

Remedies

  • Compensation for unfair termination.
  • Arrears of salary.
  • Arrears of house rent allowance.
  • Public holidays pay.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Employment Act 2007
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case