SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Josphat Cosmas Onyango v Tribe Hotel Ltd [2017] KEELRC 1286 (KLR)

[2017] KEELRC 1286 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
1286
Citation
[2017] KEELRC 1286 (KLR)
Decided
6 April 2017
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeContempt of CourtPostureAppeal from original trialCoramPresiding Judge
Holding

The Employment and Labour Relations Court finds the Respondent, its officers, directors, and human resource manager in contempt of Court orders issued on May 5, 2016, and September 20, 2016.

Facts

The Claimant, Joseph Cosmas Onyango, was sent on leave by the Respondent, Tribe Hotel Ltd, on May 5, 2016, and September 20, 2016. Despite this, the Respondent did not pay his due salaries and allowances, which included school fees for his children.

Issues

  1. Contempt of Court
  2. Obedience to Court Orders

Reasoning

The Court held that disobeying Court orders is a serious offense that undermines the rule of law and good order in society. The Respondent's failure to comply with the Court's orders to pay the Claimant's due salaries and allowances is a direct affront to justice.

Outcome

The Respondent and its officers, directors, and human resource manager are found in contempt of Court.

Orders

  • Sanction the Respondent with jail terms to ensure compliance with Court orders

Remedies

  • Sanction the Respondent with jail terms to ensure compliance with Court orders

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • Civil Procedure Act
  • Contempt of Court Act
  • Employment and Labour Relations Court Act
Cases cited (1)
  • Teachers Service Commission v Kenya National Union of Teachers & 2 Others [2013] KLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case