SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Willis Ogola Okendo v Collins Oyuu & 3 others [2017] KEELRC 1390 (KLR)

[2017] KEELRC 1390 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
1390
Citation
[2017] KEELRC 1390 (KLR)
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeReview of JudgementPostureApplication for review of judgement dismissedCoramMAUREEN ONYANGO
The application is dismissed as it is not a suitable case for review.

Facts

The plaintiff filed a case in the High Court at Kisumu on 23 September 2014. The defendants failed to appear and serve the plaintiff with their defence and other papers. The plaintiff filed an application for judgment on 25 November 2014, but the court favoured the 4th defendant. The plaintiff attended the hearing on 19 March 2015 but the defendants failed to appear. The plaintiff filed an application for formal proof on 13 May 2015, but the defendants failed to attend.

Issues

  • ambiguity of the application for review
  • failure to cite prescribed grounds for review
  • complaints against the court and the High Court
  • issues that should be subject of appeal

Reasoning

The application is ambiguous and does not cite any of the prescribed grounds for review. It contains elements of complaints against the court and the High Court, and issues that should be subject of appeal.

Outcome

Application dismissed

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Employment and Labour Relations Court Act
  • Employment and Labour Relations Court Procedure Rules
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case