SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kefa Nyamweya Mokaya v Nyamira Tea Farmers Savings and Credit Co-operative Society Limited [2017] KEELRC 1393 (KLR)

[2017] KEELRC 1393 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
1393
Citation
[2017] KEELRC 1393 (KLR)
Decided
26 April 2017
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypePreliminary ObjectionPostureRespondent's preliminary objection to claimant's applicationCoramD. K. N. Marete
Holding

The court dismisses the preliminary objection and orders each party to bear their own costs.

Facts

The claimant filed an application against the respondent regarding a loan and its recoveries, which the respondent argued was not an employment or labour relations issue.

Issues

  1. Whether the court has jurisdiction to hear the claimant's application
  2. Whether the court should dismiss the claimant's application as an abuse of the court's jurisdiction

Reasoning

The court finds that the court has jurisdiction over the matter as it relates to employment and labour relations, and the respondent's argument about jurisdiction is not valid.

Outcome

The court dismisses the preliminary objection.

Orders

  • Each party to bear their own costs of the application

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Employment and Labour Relations Court Act
  • Employment Act, 2007
Cases cited (5)
  • Professor Daniel N. Mugendi vs Kenyatta University and 3 others
  • Samuel Kamau Macharia and Another Versus Kenya Commercial Bank and 2 Others
  • Rafiki Enterprises Limited vs Kingsway Tyres & Automart Limited
  • Trusted Society of Human Rights Alliance vs Nakuru Water and Sanitation Services Company & Another
  • Republic v Clerk County Assembly of Baringo ex parte William Kassait Kamket
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case