SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Republic v Kenya Medical Research Institute & 2 others ex-parte Solomon S.R. Mpoke [2017] KEELRC 1948 (KLR)

[2017] KEELRC 1948 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
1948
Citation
[2017] KEELRC 1948 (KLR)
Decided
27 January 2017
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeJudicial ReviewPostureApplication for Leave to Apply for Prohibition and CertiorariCoramMATHEWS NDERI NDUMA
The court declines to allow the proposed interested party to be heard in this matter and does not deem the applicant a proper person to be heard.

Facts

The applicant, Solomon S.R. Mpoke, seeks leave to apply for an order of prohibition and certiorari against the Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI) and its Chairperson. Mpoke alleges that the appointment of the applicant as KEMRI's director was conducted in violation of a court order and that KEMRI does not exist in law.

Issues

  • Whether the proposed interested party is a proper person to be heard in this matter.
  • Whether the applicant's appointment as KEMRI's director was conducted in violation of a court order.
  • Whether KEMRI exists in law and can be sued.

Reasoning

The proposed interested party is no longer an official of UNRISK and is not likely to be adversely affected by the court's decision. The court also finds that KEMRI does not exist in law and cannot be sued.

Outcome

The court declines to allow the applicant to be heard and makes no order as to costs.

⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case