SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Shadrack Kosgey Cherogoe & another v County Assembly of Nakuru & 2 others [2017] KEELRC 223 (KLR)

[2017] KEELRC 223 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
223
Citation
[2017] KEELRC 223 (KLR)
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeLabor DisputePostureRespondents filed preliminary objection, Court dismissed, Petitioners filed main petition, Court gave directions for submissions
The Court dismissed the preliminary objection and ordered the parties to file submissions and appear for hearing.

Facts

County Assembly formed an ad hoc Committee to investigate recruitment and employment of sub-county, deputy sub-county and ward administrators. Special Adhoc Committee tabled a report recommending termination of Joseph Motari and Philip Sigei's contracts. Petitioners moved Court for conservatory orders.

Issues

  • Whether the 1st Respondent’s actions were unconstitutional
  • Whether the 1st Respondent’s actions were in breach of the doctrine of separation of powers

Reasoning

The Petitioners argued that the 1st Respondent could not use its oversight authority to investigate and recommend the removal of Interested Parties, as this would breach the doctrine of separation of powers. The Court agreed.

Outcome

Preliminary objection dismissed, main petition filed, directions for submissions given

Orders

  • Conservatory order set aside
  • Directions for filing and service of submissions

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • County Governments Act
  • Industrial Court Act
  • Constitution of Kenya
Cases cited (1)
  • Elizabeth Nziza Masaku v County Government of Nakuru (2014) eKLR
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case