SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

David Wafula Munyasia v Forum SYD [2017] KEELRC 684 (KLR)

[2017] KEELRC 684 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
684
Citation
[2017] KEELRC 684 (KLR)
Decided
29 September 2017
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeUnlawful Termination of EmploymentPostureClaimant vs RespondentCoramMaraga
Holding

The termination of the Claimant’s employment was on account of redundancy and was lawful and fair.

Facts

Claimant was employed by Respondent as Finance and Administration Officer from April 1, 2010. He was appointed Finance Officer in August 2012 with a monthly salary of Kshs. 200,000 and a 15% pension benefit. On January 16, 2014, he was appointed Finance Manager for a fixed term contract of 12 months. The contract was terminated on March 28, 2014, on account of redundancy.

Issues

  1. Whether the termination of the Claimant’s employment was lawful and fair
  2. Whether the Claimant is entitled to the remedies sought

Reasoning

The termination was due to a restructuring process initiated in 2011, leading to the abolition of regional offices and the creation of a new position. The Respondent followed the Employment Act and Labour Relations Act guidelines for redundancy.

Outcome

The Claimant's employment was terminated on account of redundancy and was lawful and fair.

Remedies

  • Salary for remainder of fixed term contract period
  • Unpaid gratuity for one year
  • One month’s salary in lieu of notice
  • Lost pension for remainder of contract period
  • One month’s leave dues
  • 12 months’ salary in compensation

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Employment Act, 2007
  • Labour Relations Act
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case