SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Wilfred K. Onyango v DHL Excel Supply Chain Kenya Limited [2017] KEELRC 885 (KLR)

[2017] KEELRC 885 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
885
Citation
[2017] KEELRC 885 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeWrongful TerminationPostureAppeal from original trialCoramHON. LADY JUSTICE HELLEN WASILWA
Holding

The Court finds the dismissal unfair and unjustified, and awards the Claimant 1 month's salary in lieu of notice, 12 months' salary as damages for unfair termination, and 12 months' salary as compensation for house allowance.

Facts

Claimant Wilfred K. Onyango was employed by Respondent DHL Excel Supply Chain Kenya Limited as a loader from October 2010 to October 2012. He was terminated without notice and without payment of terminal dues. He claimed damages for wrongful and unfair termination.

Issues

  1. Was the termination wrongful and unfair?
  2. Was the Claimant entitled to compensation for house allowance?

Reasoning

The Court found the termination to be unfair and unjustified, citing lack of notice and adherence to procedural requirements. The Claimant was not a permanent or contract employee but a piece rate worker.

Outcome

Claimant's appeal upheld

Orders

  • Award of 1 month's salary in lieu of notice
  • Award of 12 months' salary as damages for unfair termination
  • Award of 12 months' salary as compensation for house allowance
  • Award of costs to the Claimant

Remedies

  • Compensation for wrongful termination
  • Compensation for house allowance

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Employment Act 2007
Cases cited (1)
  • Alex Muriuki Bundi vs. Kakuzi Ltd Civil Case No. 195 of 2003
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case