SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kenya Private University Workers Union v Kenya Methodist University [2017] KEELRC 925 (KLR)

[2017] KEELRC 925 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
925
Citation
[2017] KEELRC 925 (KLR)
Decided
21 July 2017
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLabour Relations DisputePostureClaimant filed suit challenging redundancy action; Respondent filed preliminary objection.CoramBYRAM ONGAYA
Holding

The court dismissed the preliminary objection and found that the claimant has the necessary standing to file the suit.

Facts

Claimant trade union filed suit challenging redundancy action against its members by the respondent. Respondent opposed the suit and filed preliminary objection.

Issues

  1. Standing of the claimant trade union in court
  2. Recognition agreement and collective bargaining agreement

Reasoning

The court held that the recognition of a trade union by an employer is not a precondition to the trade union's standing in court. The claimant's suit is a referral of an unresolved trade dispute.

Outcome

Preliminary objection dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • Parties are now invited to take directions on further steps in the suit.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Labour Relations Act, 2007
  • Employment and Labour Relations Court Act, 2011
Cases cited (3)
  • Communication Workers' Union –Versus- Safaricom Limited [2014]eKLR
  • Kenya Union of Employees of Voluntary and Charitable Organisations (KUEVACO) –Versus- Board of Governors & Maina Wanjigi Secondary School [2015]eKLR
  • Kenya Shipping, Clearing and Warehouses Workers Union –Versus- Africair Management & Logistics Limited [2016]eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case