SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Adel W. Ottoman & 5 others (suing on behalf of themselves and all other members of the Medical Laboratory Officers Union) v Registrar of Trade Unions & 3 others [2018] KEELRC 1393 (KLR)

[2018] KEELRC 1393 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
1393
Citation
[2018] KEELRC 1393 (KLR)
Decided
27 July 2018
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeAppealPostureAppeal from the Registrar of Trade Unions' decision to deny registration of the proposed unionCoramRadido Stephen
The Court allows the appeal and orders the registration of the proposed union

Facts

The Appellants applied to register the Kenya National Union of Medical Laboratory Officers, but the Registrar of Trade Unions denied the application, citing objections from other unions. The Appellants appealed the decision.

Issues

  • Whether the decision to deny registration was made by the National Labour Board or the Registrar of Trade Unions
  • Whether section 14(1)(d) of the Labour Relations Act is consistent with the Constitution

Reasoning

The Court agrees with the Appellants that the decision to deny registration was not made by the Registrar of Trade Unions, but by the National Labour Board. The Court also finds that section 14(1)(d) of the Labour Relations Act is inconsistent with the Constitution.

Outcome

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • Registration of the proposed union
  • Each party to bear their own costs

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Labour Relations Act
Cases cited (3)
  • Justus Aloo Ogeka & 6 Ors v Registrar of Trade Unions & 2 Ors (2016) eKLR
  • David Benedict Omulama & 8 Ors v Registrar of Trade Unions & Ar (2014) eKLR
  • Seth Panyako & Ors v Attorney General (2013) eKLR
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case