James Gichana Ondeu & Josephine Kerubo (suing as the legal administrators of the Estate of the Late Ezekiel Kagwimi Gichana (Deceased) v Kenya Shield Security Limited (Appeal 35 of 2017) [2018] KEELRC 14 (KLR) (17 September 2018) (Judgment)
- Court
- Employment & Labour Relations Court
- Case number
- 14
- Citation
- [2018] KEELRC 14 (KLR)
- Decided
- 17 September 2018
AI Summary
Beta
Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeEmployment and Labour RelationsPostureAppeal from a previous judgmentCoramM. MBARU
Holding
The court finds that the trial court erred in dismissing the appellant's case and confirms an award of damages at Kshs.460,000.00.
Facts
The appellant, James Gichana Ondeu, filed an appeal against the dismissal of his case by the trial court. The appellant alleged that the respondent, Kenya Shield Security Limited, breached its duty of care by not providing proper safety equipment to the deceased, Ezekiel Kagwimi Gichana.
Issues
- Whether the trial court erred in finding that the appellant had not proved his case on a balance of probability
- Whether the trial court erred in apportioning liability
- Whether the trial court erred in finding that the respondent was negligent and liable for the deceased's death
- Whether the trial court erred in not finding that the failure to provide protective devices contributed to the death
- Whether the trial court erred in not noting the contradictions in the respondent's evidence
Reasoning
The court held that the respondent, Kenya Shield Security Limited, breached its duty of care by not providing proper safety equipment to the deceased, Ezekiel Kagwimi Gichana. The court found that the respondent was liable for the deceased's death.
Outcome
Appeal successful
Orders
- Award of damages at Kshs.460,000.00
Remedies
- Award of damages
Authorities cited
Legislation (1)
- Employment and Labour Relations Act
Cases cited (3)
- Embu Public Road Services Limited Versus Riimi (1968) EA 22
- Mumias Sugar Company Ltd Versus Charles Namatiti (CA 151/87)
- Boniface Muthama Kavita Versus Carton Manufacturers Limited (2015) eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Loading judgment…