SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

John Githua Mbate& 2 others v Registrar of Trade Unions & another [2018] KEELRC 1738 (KLR)

[2018] KEELRC 1738 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
1738
Citation
[2018] KEELRC 1738 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeAppealPostureAppeal from the Registrar of Trade Unions' decision to refuse registration of the Kenya Teachers CongressCoramAnother Rika, KLR Nduma, Kantai, Mbaru, Nduma, Rika, Wooding
Holding

The court held that the refusal of the Registrar of Trade Unions to register the Kenya Teachers Congress was not unconstitutional and invalid, and that the Appellants' rights were not infringed.

Facts

The Kenya Teachers Congress, proposed by John Githua Mbate, Stephen Otundoh Moriasi, and Onesmus Nzuve Ndivo, was refused registration by the Registrar of Trade Unions on October 30, 2017. The Appellants claim this decision infringes their constitutional rights to association and to form, join, and participate in a trade union of their choice.

Issues

  1. Whether the Registrar of Trade Unions subordinated herself to the National Labour Board in the refusal to register the proposed union
  2. Whether the refusal by the Registrar of Trade Unions was tantamount to a denial of the Appellants' rights under Articles 36 and 41 of the Constitution and therefore unconstitutional and invalid
  3. Who is to bear the costs of the appeal

Reasoning

The court found that the refusal was not ultra vires the Constitution and did not deny the Appellants' rights to association and representation by a trade union of their choice.

Outcome

Affirmed

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Labour Relations Act
  • Constitution of Kenya
Cases cited (1)
  • Kenya Concrete, Structural, Ceramics, Tiles, Wood Plys and Interior Designs Workers Union v Registrar of Trade Unions & Another Rika J.
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case