SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kenya Union of Commercial, Food and Allied Workers Union v Ruthaka Farmers’ Co-operative Society [2018] KEELRC 1791 (KLR)

[2018] KEELRC 1791 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
1791
Citation
[2018] KEELRC 1791 (KLR)
Decided
10 April 2018
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLabour Relations DisputePostureAppeal from a decision to strike out a claimCoramNzioki wa Makau
Holding

The Claimant's claim is rejected and struck out with costs to the Respondent due to procedural defects and the presence of another union.

Facts

The Kenya Union of Commercial, Food and Allied Workers Union (Claimant) seeks union dues deduction and remittance from June 2017 to date from Ruthaka Farmers' Co-operative Society (Respondent). The Claimant claims 51% of the Respondent's employees, and asserts the Respondent should recognize it as a union. The Respondent argues there is a pre-existing recognition agreement with another union and that recognizing the Claimant would cause chaos.

Issues

  1. Whether the Claimant is entitled to union dues deduction and remittance from the Respondent
  2. Whether the Claimant's claim should be struck out due to procedural defects

Reasoning

The court found the Claimant did not obtain a ministerial order directing deductions and did not follow the proper recognition process under Section 54 of the Labour Relations Act. The court also noted the presence of another union on the ground.

Outcome

The Claimant's claim is rejected and struck out with costs to the Respondent.

Orders

  • The Claimant's claim is rejected and struck out with costs to the Respondent

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Labour Relations Act
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.0 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case