SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Robert Githua Githaka v SAAB Kenya Limited [2018] KEELRC 1836 (KLR)

[2018] KEELRC 1836 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
1836
Citation
[2018] KEELRC 1836 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeEmployment DisputePostureAppeal from a decision of the Employment and Labour Relations Court of Kenya at NyeriCoramNzioki wa Makau
Holding

The court held that the retirement notice was premature, unfair, and unlawful, and awarded the Claimant 6 months salary as compensation.

Facts

The Claimant, Robert Githua Githaka, was dismissed from his employment with the Respondent, SAAB Kenya Limited, on September 16, 2016. The Claimant alleged that the dismissal was premature, unlawful, and unfair, and sought various remedies including a declaration, compensation, and reinstatement.

Issues

  1. Whether the retirement of the Claimant was agreed or implied to be at 60 years
  2. Whether the Respondent is estopped from reneging from the position in i) above
  3. Whether the retirement notice dated 16th September 2016 was unlawful, unfair and premature
  4. Whether the Claimant is entitled to relief sought and who is to bear the costs of the suit

Reasoning

The court found that the Respondent acted unfairly and did not provide adequate notice or counselling, leading to an unfair retirement process. The court declined to award the full amount sought by the Claimant but ordered 6 months salary as compensation.

Outcome

The court entered judgment for the Claimant against the Respondent for Kshs. 355,626 and costs of the suit.

Orders

  • Award of 6 months salary as compensation to the Claimant

Remedies

  • Compensation for unlawful termination of employment
  • Costs of the suit

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Employment Act
Cases cited (1)
  • John Benson Githinji v Attorney General & 4 Others (supra)
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case