SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Simon Kinyua M’thambura v Chandaria Industries Limited [2018] KEELRC 1932 (KLR)

[2018] KEELRC 1932 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
1932
Citation
[2018] KEELRC 1932 (KLR)
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeUnfair DismissalPostureClaimant vs RespondentCoramBYRAM ONGAYA
The termination was unfair and the claimant is awarded Kshs. 385,524.00 in compensation for the unfair termination.

Facts

The claimant worked as a machine operator for Chandaria Industries Limited from 2005 to 2014. He was diagnosed with a medical condition related to dust exposure and requested to be redeployed away from dusty work. The respondent declined and the claimant was terminated.

Issues

  • Whether the termination was unfair
  • Whether the claimant is entitled to other reliefs as prayed for

Reasoning

The court found that the claimant had a genuine grievance and that the respondent failed to amicably resolve the claimant's grievance for deployment to a dust-free environment. The court also found that the respondent did not provide due medical attention to the claimant.

Outcome

Judgment in favor of the claimant

Orders

  • The respondent to pay the claimant a sum of Kshs. 449,778.00 by 01.08.2018 failing interest at Court rates to be payable thereon from the date of this judgment till full payment.
  • The respondent to pay costs of the suit.

Remedies

  • Compensation of Kshs. 385,524.00 for the unfair termination

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Employment and Labour Relations Act
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case