SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Edwin Odhiambo Sindala v Samba Enterprises Limited & another [2018] KEELRC 2127 (KLR)

[2018] KEELRC 2127 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
2127
Citation
[2018] KEELRC 2127 (KLR)
Decided
6 April 2018
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

The dismissal was unlawful and unfair, and the Claimant is entitled to compensation equivalent to four months' salary.

Facts

The Claimant was employed as a stock controller by the Respondents. He was suspended indefinitely on September 25, 2012, for underperformance. The Respondents did not recall him until after the suit was filed. The Claimant was not registered with NSSF and no contributions were made on his behalf.

Issues

  • Whether the dismissal was for a valid reason and in terms of a fair procedure.
  • Whether the Claimant is entitled to the reliefs sought.

Reasoning

The Respondents failed to provide a valid reason for the indefinite suspension and did not follow a fair procedure. The court found the dismissal to be unlawful and unfair, and awarded compensation.

Outcome

The Claimant is awarded compensation equivalent to four months' salary.

Orders

  • The Claimant is awarded Kshs.15,000 for unpaid salary for September 2012.
  • The Claimant is awarded Kshs.42,000 in lieu of unpaid leave.
  • The Claimant is awarded Kshs.22,000 for double payment during public holidays worked.
  • The Claimant is awarded Kshs.30,000 for service pay.
  • The Claimant is awarded compensation equivalent to four months' salary.
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case