SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Stephen Munyua Waiyali v Kenya Tea Development Agency [2018] KEELRC 2164 (KLR)

[2018] KEELRC 2164 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
2164
Citation
[2018] KEELRC 2164 (KLR)
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeEmployment DisputePostureApplication for leave to file suit out of timeCoramMAUREEN ONYANGO
The court dismisses the application as it has no jurisdiction to grant the order sought.

Facts

The applicant, Stephen Munyua Waiyali, was employed by the respondent, Kenya Tea Development Agency, on 19 October 1981. He was summarily dismissed on 15 June 2007 without being given an opportunity to be heard.

Issues

  • Whether the court has jurisdiction to hear the applicant's claim for compensation for unfair termination.
  • Whether the applicant's claim is statute barred due to the limitation period provided in the Limitation of Actions Act.

Reasoning

The court holds that the limitation period for employment cases before the enactment of the Employment Act 2007 was 6 years, as provided under Section 14(1) of the Limitation of Actions Act. The court further states that the court has no jurisdiction to hear a claim that is statute barred.

Outcome

Application dismissed

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Limitation of Actions Act
  • Employment Act 2007
Cases cited (6)
  • James Muriithi Ngotho -vs- Judicial Service Commission [2012] eKLR
  • Nyanamba O. Steve -vs- Teachers Service Commission [2016] eKLR
  • Owners of Vessel Lillian 'S' -vs- Caltex Oil (K) Ltd.
  • Divecon -vs- Samani
  • In Re The Matter of the Interim Independent Electoral Commission S.C. Constitutional Application No. 2 of 2011
  • Samuel Kamau Macharia & Another -vs- Kenya Commercial Bank Limited & 2 Others S.C Application No. 2 of 2012
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case