SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Mourice Wafula Namakwa v Kenya Boats Limited [2018] KEELRC 2231 (KLR)

[2018] KEELRC 2231 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
2231
Citation
[2018] KEELRC 2231 (KLR)
Decided
8 March 2018
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeUnfair TerminationPostureClaimant vs RespondentCoramJames Rika
Termination was flawed in procedure and to that extent, unfair.

Facts

Claimant was employed as a Night Guard by Respondent from February 2012. His contract was terminated on July 23, 2015, after he misled a client about the status of the client's car. Claimant was paid Kshs. 10,000 on termination.

Issues

  • Unfair termination
  • Compensation for unfair termination
  • Salary in lieu of notice
  • Public holiday pay
  • Annual leave pay

Reasoning

The Court found valid reason for termination but criticized the lack of procedural protections under the Employment Act 2007. The Claimant was not given a chance to defend himself and was not provided with a letter to show cause.

Outcome

Claimant granted compensation for unfair termination, salary in lieu of notice, public holiday pay, and annual leave pay.

Orders

  • Equivalent of 6 months' salary in compensation for unfair termination at Kshs. 60,000
  • 1 month salary in lieu of notice at Kshs. 10,000
  • Public holiday pay at Kshs. 11,538
  • Annual leave pay at Kshs. 24,230
  • Costs to the Claimant
  • Interest granted at 14% per annum from the date of Judgment till payment is made in full

Remedies

  • Compensation for unfair termination
  • Salary in lieu of notice
  • Public holiday pay
  • Annual leave pay
  • Costs to the Claimant
  • Interest

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Employment Act 2007
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case