SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Republic v County Secretary County Government of Tharaka Nithi & another Ex parte Kenneth Ntwiga Kanga v [2018] KEELRC 2284 (KLR)

[2018] KEELRC 2284 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
2284
Citation
[2018] KEELRC 2284 (KLR)
Decided
25 January 2018
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeJudicial ReviewPostureAppeal from a decision of the Employment & Labour Relations Court of KenyaCoramNzioki wa Makau
The court declined to recuse itself and dismissed the application for judicial review.

Facts

Mr. Kenneth Ntwiga Kanga applied for leave to apply for judicial review of a decision of the Employment & Labour Relations Court of Kenya, claiming that the court had improperly taken charge of matters before it and that he had not been given a hearing before Dr. Kuria.

Issues

  • Whether the Employment & Labour Relations Court of Kenya had improperly taken charge of matters before it.
  • Whether the Employment & Labour Relations Court of Kenya had given Mr. Kanga a hearing before Dr. Kuria.

Reasoning

The court held that the title of Senior Counsel does not give them the power to usurp the role of courts in settling lists or disputes of cases, and that the Judiciary is independent and not under the direction of any arm of Government.

Outcome

Application for leave to apply for judicial review dismissed.

Orders

  • The court declined to recuse itself from the matter.
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case