SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Julo Mbandi Julo v Ali Abdalla Abdul Rahman t/a Al Madina Building Construction Limited [2018] KEELRC 2461 (KLR)

[2018] KEELRC 2461 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
2461
Citation
[2018] KEELRC 2461 (KLR)
Decided
9 February 2018
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeEmployment DisputePostureClaimant filed a Statement of Claim, Respondent filed a General Statement of Denial, and the case was decided on the record.CoramJames Rika
The Court found the termination to be unfair and ordered the Respondent to pay notice pay, compensation for unfair termination, accrued annual leave, and service pay.

Facts

The Claimant was employed as a Casual Worker by the Respondent from 2000, becoming a Site Supervisor and later a Driver. The contract was terminated verbally on August 17, 2015, without notice or valid reason.

Issues

  • Unfair termination of employment
  • Notice pay
  • Compensation for unfair termination
  • Accrued annual leave
  • Service pay

Reasoning

The Court ruled that the termination was unfair due to lack of procedural fairness and valid reason, and ordered the Respondent to pay the specified amounts.

Outcome

The Respondent was ordered to pay the Claimant notice pay, compensation for unfair termination, accrued annual leave, and service pay.

Orders

  • Termination was unfair
  • The Respondent shall pay the Claimant: notice pay at Kshs. 10,500; compensation for unfair termination at Kshs. 63,000; annual leave pay at Kshs. 16,961; and service pay at Kshs. 12,115- total Kshs. 102,576

Remedies

  • Notice pay
  • Compensation for unfair termination
  • Accrued annual leave
  • Service pay

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Employment Act 2007
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case