SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Rudolf Shitandi Daraja v John Brown Shilenje T/A JB Shilenje & Company Advocates [2018] KEELRC 2468 (KLR)

[2018] KEELRC 2468 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
2468
Citation
[2018] KEELRC 2468 (KLR)
Decided
26 January 2018
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeEmployment DisputePostureAppeal from an original trial decisionCoramRUDOLF SHITANDI DARA
Holding

The court finds that the claimant was summarily dismissed unlawfully and unfairly, and is entitled to compensation in terms of Section 49(1)(c) of the Employment Act.

Facts

The claimant Rudolf Shitandi Daraja was employed as a court clerk by the Respondent John Brown Shilenje T/A JB Shilenje & Company Advocates from August 21, 2013, to December 20, 2014. The employment was terminated without notice or payment of terminal benefits after the claimant declined to withdraw a pending suit against his former employer.

Issues

  1. Whether the claimant was a temporary employee or a protected employee under the Employment Act.
  2. Whether the claimant absconded work or the employment was wrongfully and unfairly terminated.
  3. Whether the claimant is entitled to the reliefs sought.

Reasoning

The employment was deemed permanent due to the continuous work period and the conversion of the contract from a temporary to a permanent one. The dismissal was found to be unlawful and unfair, and the claimant is entitled to compensation.

Outcome

The claimant is awarded five (5) months salary in compensation.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Employment Act, 2007
Cases cited (1)
  • ELRC No. 196 of 2014, Rudolf Shitandi Daraja Vs. Zablon Juma Atulo t/a Z.J. Atulo & Co. advocate
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case