SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Gabriel Mutuku Mbobu v Independent Communications Associates [2018] KEELRC 2478 (KLR)

[2018] KEELRC 2478 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
2478
Citation
[2018] KEELRC 2478 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeEmployment DisputePostureAppeal from a decision of the Senior Resident Magistrate's Court, transferred to the Employment and Labour Relations Court
Holding

The Claimant is not entitled to service pay as the Respondent did not view NSSF as a serious social security mechanism, and the contract of employment did not provide for service pay.

Facts

The Claimant, Gabriel Mutuku Mbobu, was employed by the Respondent, Independent Communications Associates, from January 2005 to March 31, 2010. He resigned with one month's notice. He claims unpaid terminal dues including salary arrears, service earned, and unpaid leave days.

Issues

  1. Whether the Claimant is entitled to the terminal benefits sought

Reasoning

The court found no evidence that the Respondent did not view NSSF as a serious social security mechanism and that the contract of employment did not provide for service pay. Therefore, service pay was not awarded.

Outcome

Judgment in favor of the Claimant for leave pay of Kshs. 50,172.40 for 21 1⁄2 days earned in 2009 and 2010, with interest at court rates from the date of filing suit until payment in full. The Claimant will have the costs of the case.

Orders

  • Judgment in favor of the Claimant for leave pay of Kshs. 50,172.40 for 21 1⁄2 days earned in 2009 and 2010
  • The Claimant will have the costs of the case

Remedies

  • Leave pay of Kshs. 50,172.40 for 21 1⁄2 days earned in 2009 and 2010 with interest at court rates until payment in full

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Employment Act, 2007
Cases cited (1)
  • Elijah Kipkoross Tonui v Ngara Opticians T/A Bright Eyes Limited [2014] eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case