SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Lennox Omondi Oyoko v Ruiru Feeds Limited [2018] KEELRC 463 (KLR)

[2018] KEELRC 463 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
463
Citation
[2018] KEELRC 463 (KLR)
Decided
17 December 2018
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeUnfair TerminationPostureAppeal from original trialCoramRadido Stephen
The Court finds the Claimant's employment was unfairly terminated and awards him compensation, wages, leave, and house allowance.

Facts

The Claimant, Lennox Omondi Oyoko, was employed as a turn boy by Ruiru Feeds Limited. He filed a lawsuit alleging wrongful and unfair termination of his services and failure to pay terminal benefits. The Respondent, Ruiru Feeds Limited, denied the allegations and claimed the Claimant was a casual employee.

Issues

  • Whether the Claimant was a casual employee
  • Whether the Claimant deserted work
  • Whether the termination was unfair
  • Whether the Claimant was entitled to unpaid wages, leave, service pay, and house allowance

Reasoning

The Court found the Claimant was not a casual employee and rejected the Respondent's defense of desertion. The Court also found the termination was unfair and awarded compensation, wages, leave, and house allowance.

Outcome

The Claimant is awarded Kshs 92,250 in total.

Orders

  • Pay in lieu of notice Kshs 9,000
  • April 2012 wages Kshs 9,000
  • Leave Kshs 9,450
  • Service pay Kshs 4,500
  • House allowance Kshs 24,300
  • Compensation Kshs 36,000

Remedies

  • Claimant to have costs of Kshs 20,000

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Employment Act, 2007
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case