SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Rufus Osotsi Olefa v Nairobi City Water & Sewarage Company Limited [2018] KEELRC 492 (KLR)

[2018] KEELRC 492 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
492
Citation
[2018] KEELRC 492 (KLR)
Decided
30 November 2018
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeEmployment DisputePostureClaimant's appeal against premature retirementCoramBYRAM ONGAYA
Claimant is entitled to a declaration of unfair termination, compensation, and other remedies

Facts

Claimant Rufus Osotsi Olefa was employed by Nairobi City Water & Sewerage Company Limited in 1991 and later in 2005. He disputed his retirement date due to his birth date being December 1955, not January 1955.

Issues

  • Claimant's birth date
  • Premature retirement
  • Retirement benefits
  • Overtime night out allowance
  • House allowance

Reasoning

Claimant's birth date was recorded as December 1955, not January 1955, and the respondent failed to institute appropriate retirement policies.

Outcome

Claimant wins

Orders

  • Claimant is awarded Kshs. 1, 835, 095.00
  • Claimant is awarded Kshs. 149, 590.00 for overtime night out allowance
  • Claimant is awarded Kshs. 189, 600.00 for refund of excess rent allowance
  • Claimant is awarded Kshs. 299, 181.00 for 3 months' pay in lieu of notice
  • Claimant is awarded Kshs. 99, 727.00 x3 months for 3 months' pay in lieu of notice

Remedies

  • Declaration of unfair termination
  • Compensation
  • Overtime night out allowance
  • House allowance refund
  • 3 months' pay in lieu of notice

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Employment Act, 2007
  • Energy Act, 2006
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case