Yussuf Daud Adan v Governor Isiolo County & 4 others [2018] KEELRC 539 (KLR)
- Court
- Employment & Labour Relations Court
- Case number
- 539
- Citation
- [2018] KEELRC 539 (KLR)
Summary at a glance
TypePetition for Invalidation of AppointmentPosturePetitioner seeks to stop the vetting process and seek compensation for alleged violation of constitutional rightsCoramNzioki wa Makau
The Governor's decision to replace the Petitioner with his brother was arbitrary and without reason, violating the Petitioner's constitutional rights.
Facts
The Petitioner, Yussuf Daud Adan, filed a petition seeking to stop the vetting process of his brother Abdi Haji Daud for his position as County Executive Committee member for Water, Energy, Environment, Natural Resource and Climate Change in Isiolo County. The Governor had sent the nomination to the County Assembly and Speaker for approval.
Issues
- Violation of Articles 1, 2, 3(1), 10, 22, 27, 28, 41, 47(1) of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010
- Violation of Rules 11, 12, 13, 20, and 21 of the Constitution of Kenya (Protection of Rights and Fundamental Freedoms) and Procedure Rules, 2013
- Violation of Sections 8 and 45 of the County Governments Act, Act 17 of 2012
Reasoning
The court found that the Governor's action was arbitrary and without reason, as there was no evidence that he acted reasonably in dismissing the Petitioner. The court ordered compensation for the breach of constitutional rights.
Outcome
The court ordered compensation of Kshs. 1,000,000/-, costs of the suit, and interest on the sums above from the date of judgment till payment in full.
Orders
- Order for compensation of Kshs. 1,000,000/-
- Order for costs of the suit
- Order for interest at court rates on the sums above from the date of judgment till payment in full
Remedies
- Compensation
- Costs of the suit
- Interest on the sums above from the date of judgment till payment in full
Authorities cited
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Loading judgment…