SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Boniface Okumu Oboku & 3 others v Hotel Bilmas Limited [2018] KEELRC 590 (KLR)

[2018] KEELRC 590 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
590
Citation
[2018] KEELRC 590 (KLR)
Decided
16 November 2018
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeUnfair Termination and Salary Arrears CasePostureAppeal from an original trial decisionCoramRadido Stephen
Holding

The termination of the Claimants' employment was unfair, and they are awarded compensation, pay in lieu of notice, severance pay, and leave.

Facts

The Claimants were instructed not to report to work by a Manager called Onjung on 11 July 2013 and 1 August 2013. They sought legal advice and a demand letter was sent. The Respondent terminated their employment on account of poor performance and theft, citing operational reasons.

Issues

  1. Unfair termination
  2. Salary arrears

Reasoning

The Court found the termination unfair due to the lack of proper notice and compliance with statutory obligations. The Claimants were awarded compensation, pay in lieu of notice, severance pay, and leave.

Outcome

The Claimants are awarded a total of Kshs 135,000 for the 1st Claimant and Kshs 98,500 for the 2nd Claimant. The 4th Claimant is awarded a total of Kshs 36,000.

Orders

  • Pay in lieu of notice Kshs 10,000 for the 1st Claimant and Kshs 8,500 for the 2nd Claimant.
  • Severance pay Kshs 15,000 for the 1st Claimant and Kshs 15,000 for the 2nd Claimant.
  • Leave Kshs 20,000 for the 1st Claimant and Kshs 15,000 for the 2nd Claimant.
  • Compensation Kshs 90,000 for the 1st Claimant and Kshs 60,000 for the 2nd Claimant.

Remedies

  • Compensation
  • Pay in lieu of notice
  • Severance pay
  • Leave

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Employment Act, 2007
Cases cited (1)
  • Bank of Uganda v Tinkamanyire (2009) 2 EA 66
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case