Erastus Gitonga Burini v Kenya Nut Company Limited [2018] KEELRC 592 (KLR)
- Court
- Employment & Labour Relations Court
- Case number
- 592
- Citation
- [2018] KEELRC 592 (KLR)
- Decided
- 19 November 2018
AI Summary
Beta
Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeReview of Consent JudgmentPostureRespondent/Applicant seeks to review a consent judgment entered into prior to the decisionCoramNzioki wa Makau
Holding
The motion is dismissed as it does not fit into any of the categories enumerated in Rule 33 and is overtaken by events.
Facts
The Respondent/Applicant seeks to review a consent judgment entered into on 3rd October 2017, which was given in November 2017. The consent was entered into before the decision in the suit.
Issues
- Whether the motion for review fits into any of the categories enumerated in Rule 33 of the Employment and Labour Relations Court (Procedure) Rules 2016
- Whether the review is subject to further review
Reasoning
The court ruled that the motion for review does not fit into any of the categories enumerated in Rule 33 and is therefore dismissed.
Outcome
The motion is dismissed
Orders
- The court dismisses the motion for review
Authorities cited
Legislation (2)
- Employment and Labour Relations Court (Procedure) Rules 2016
- Employment and Labour Relations Act 2007
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Loading judgment…