SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Elizabeth Agutu Odhiambo v Waumini Sacco Society [2018] KEELRC 63 (KLR)

[2018] KEELRC 63 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
63
Citation
[2018] KEELRC 63 (KLR)
Decided
20 December 2018
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLabor DisputePosturePetition for Injunction and Retention of PositionCoramRika
Holding

The court granted an interim conservatory injunction order to retain the petitioner in her position as Marketing Manager without reduction of salary and without breaching the contract of employment.

Facts

Petitioner was demoted from Marketing Manager to Customer Care Officer, had her salary reduced from Kshs. 110,000 to Kshs. 75,000, and was transferred from Nairobi to Nakuru. She filed a petition seeking to retain her position and salary, and to prevent the respondent from enlisting another person in her position.

Issues

  1. Whether the demotion and salary reduction were procedurally and substantively fair
  2. Whether the respondent's unilateral decision to appoint the petitioner as Marketing Manager was valid
  3. Whether the respondent's actions violated the petitioner's contract of employment and human resource policy

Reasoning

The court found that the respondent's unilateral decision to appoint the petitioner as Marketing Manager was not procedurally fair and violated the petitioner's contract of employment and human resource policy.

Outcome

Petitioner's application granted

Orders

  • Interim conservatory injunction order to retain petitioner in her position as Marketing Manager without reduction of salary and without breaching the contract of employment

Remedies

  • Interim conservatory injunction order to retain petitioner in her position as Marketing Manager without reduction of salary and without breaching the contract of employment
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case