SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Bomu Riwa Bomu v Onally Hassanali Gullamhussein t/a Alifiya Bakers & Confectioners [2018] KEELRC 656 (KLR)

[2018] KEELRC 656 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
656
Citation
[2018] KEELRC 656 (KLR)
Decided
8 November 2018
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeEmployment DisputePostureClaim and CounterclaimCoramLINNET NDOLO
Holding

The Claimant's claim for unlawful termination fails and is dismissed. The Claimant is awarded leave pay for 3 years and the Respondent is awarded one month's salary in lieu of notice plus an outstanding loan balance.

Facts

The Claimant, Bomu Riwa Bomu, was employed as a baker by the Respondent, Onally Hassanali Gullamhussein, trading as Alifiya Bakers & Confectioners. The Claimant claims unfair termination and seeks compensation for leave days not granted.

Issues

  1. Whether the Claimant has made out a case for unlawful termination of employment
  2. Whether the Claimant is entitled to the remedies sought
  3. Whether the Respondent has made out a proper counterclaim against the Claimant

Reasoning

The Court finds the Claimant's testimony regarding the circumstances of his separation from employment untrue and dismisses his claim for unlawful termination. The Court also dismisses the Claimant's claim for leave pay as he did not go on leave.

Outcome

The Respondent pays the Claimant Kshs. 26,900.

Orders

  • The Claimant is awarded leave pay for 3 years
  • The Respondent is awarded one month's salary in lieu of notice plus an outstanding loan balance
  • The net effect is that the Respondent will pay to the Claimant the sum of Kshs. 26,900

Remedies

  • Leave pay for 3 years
  • One month's salary in lieu of notice plus an outstanding loan balance

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Employment Act, 2007
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case