SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kenya Union of Entertainment and Music Industry Employees v Bomas of Kenya Limited [2018] KEELRC 767 (KLR)

[2018] KEELRC 767 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
767
Citation
[2018] KEELRC 767 (KLR)
Decided
26 October 2018
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLabour Relations DisputePostureAppeal from an order of the National Labour Board
Holding

The Claimant has lost the right to continue representing the unionisable staff of the respondent due to losing majority representation.

Facts

The parties had a Recognition Agreement and Collective Bargaining Agreement from 2012 to 2014. The respondent applied to revoke the Recognition Agreement and recognized a rival union, concluding a new Collective Bargaining Agreement.

Issues

  1. Whether the Claimant has lost the right to continue representing the unionisable staff of the respondent.
  2. Whether the respondent was served with the Court Order dated 8.12.2015.
  3. Whether the respondent was bound to recognize KUDHEIHA and conclude a Collective Bargaining Agreement with her.
  4. Whether the Order issued on 25.10.2016 was served on the respondent and the Ministry of Labour or brought to the attention of Abuodha, J. before he registered the Collective Bargaining Agreement on 26.10.2016.
  5. Whether the Collective Bargaining Agreement registered on 26.10.2016 was valid and binding on the respondent and her unionisable staff.

Reasoning

The Claimant lost 111 out of 136 unionisable staff members to KUDHEIHA by August and October 2015, making it impossible for her to represent a simple majority of the workforce.

Outcome

The respondent was not bound to recognize KUDHEIHA and conclude a Collective Bargaining Agreement with her.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Labour Relations Act
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case