Wilter Nyanchama Stephen v Family Town (2002) Limited & another [2018] KEELRC 95 (KLR)
- Court
- Employment & Labour Relations Court
- Case number
- 95
- Citation
- [2018] KEELRC 95 (KLR)
Summary at a glance
The application is found merited and is hereby allowed with the consequence that the 2nd respondent Lorenzo Ventura is removed from the suit.
Facts
Claimant Stephen Wilter Nyanchama filed a motion to remove Lorenzo Ventura from the proceedings, arguing Ventura was not an employee of the Respondent Family Town (2002) Limited and Ventura signed the employment and termination letters as the Respondent's authorized agent.
Issues
- Whether Ventura is an employee of the Respondent Family Town (2002) Limited
- Whether Ventura signed the employment and termination letters as an authorized agent of the Respondent
Reasoning
The court found that Ventura was an employee of the Respondent Family Town (2002) Limited and that Ventura signed the employment and termination letters as the Respondent's authorized agent.
Outcome
The 2nd respondent Lorenzo Ventura is removed from the suit.
Orders
- The 2nd respondent Lorenzo Ventura is removed from the suit.
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Loading judgment…