SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Lucy Njoki Waithaka v Tribunal appointed to investigate the conduct of Lucy Njoki Waithaka & another; Kenya Magistrates and Judges Association (Interested Party) [2019] KEELRC 10 (KLR)

[2019] KEELRC 10 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
10
Citation
[2019] KEELRC 10 (KLR)
Decided
11 December 2019
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypePetition for Judicial ReviewPostureRespondent's PetitionCoramInoti, Mr. Isaac, Odunga, Okwengu, Omondi, Warsame
The Court found that the petitioner's petition was not justiciable and dismissed it.

Facts

The petitioner, Justice Lucy Njoki Waithaka, was the Presiding Judge of the Environment and Land Court in Nyeri until her suspension on June 4, 2019. She filed a petition against the Tribunal appointed on June 4, 2019, to investigate her conduct.

Issues

  • Whether the proper forum is this Court or the 1st respondent.
  • Whether there exist exceptional circumstances warranting bypassing the 1st respondent to exercise the Court's jurisdiction over employment and labour relations issues.

Reasoning

The Court determined that the petitioner's petition did not meet the threshold for justiciability and that the 1st respondent was the appropriate forum to address the issues.

Outcome

Petition dismissed

Authorities cited

Legislation (4)
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010
  • Judicial Service Act, 2011
  • Employment and Labour Relations Court Act, 2011
  • Judicial Code of Conduct and Ethics
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case