SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Chama Cha Mawakili (CCM) v Chairperson Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission & 2 others [2019] KEELRC 1017 (KLR)

[2019] KEELRC 1017 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
1017
Citation
[2019] KEELRC 1017 (KLR)
Decided
26 July 2019
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeLabor RelationsPosturePetition and ApplicationCoramBYRAM ONGAYA
The court orders the recruitment process to be temporarily halted and the shortlisted candidates to be re-evaluated with a predetermined and objective score-sheet.

Facts

CCM filed a petition and application against the Chairperson of IEBC and others, alleging contraventions of constitutional and statutory provisions related to the recruitment process for the position of Commission Secretary/Chief Executive Officer.

Issues

  • violation of constitutional and statutory provisions regarding recruitment process
  • conflict of interest in the recruitment process

Reasoning

CCM established a prima facie case that the recruitment process violated constitutional and statutory provisions, and the court found that the process was continuing unlawfully.

Outcome

The court issued an order to stop the recruitment process and the interviewing of shortlisted candidates.

Orders

  • Order to stop the recruitment process and interviewing of shortlisted candidates

Remedies

  • Re-evaluation of shortlisted candidates with predetermined and objective score-sheet

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010
  • Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission Act, 2011
  • Employment and Labour Relations Court (Procedure) Rules, 2016
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case