SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Margaret Injete Shadrack v Radar Security Limited [2019] KEELRC 1323 (KLR)

[2019] KEELRC 1323 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
1323
Citation
[2019] KEELRC 1323 (KLR)
Decided
21 June 2019
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeEmployment DisputePostureClaimant's Statement of Claim filed, Respondent's response, JudgmentCoramJames Rika
Claimant was discriminated against on account of her pregnancy and termination was unfair. The Respondent shall pay compensation, damages, and terminal dues at Kshs. 827,184.

Facts

Claimant was employed as a Guard by Respondent from March 2012. She became pregnant in October 2014 and applied for maternity leave. She was terminated on account of her pregnancy and denied salary and other benefits.

Issues

  • Discrimination on account of pregnancy
  • Unfair termination
  • Overtime pay
  • Maternity leave pay
  • Accrued annual leave
  • Severance pay
  • Compensation for gender discrimination
  • Compensation for unfair termination

Reasoning

The court found that the termination was procedurally unfair and violated the Employment Act, leading to a declaration of unfair termination and compensation.

Outcome

Claimant wins, Respondent pays compensation and damages.

Orders

  • It is declared that the Claimant was discriminated against on account of her pregnancy.
  • It is declared that termination was unfair.
  • The Respondent shall pay to the Claimant compensation, damages and terminal dues at Kshs. 827,184 as pleaded.
  • Costs to the Claimant.
  • Interest allowed at 14% per annum from the date of Judgment, till payment is made in full.

Remedies

  • Compensation
  • Damages
  • Terminal dues

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Employment Act 2007
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case