SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Linus Tambiti Bala v Samba Brazilia Limited [2019] KEELRC 1479 (KLR)

[2019] KEELRC 1479 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
1479
Citation
[2019] KEELRC 1479 (KLR)
Decided
31 May 2019
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeUnfair dismissalPostureClaimant's appeal from a dismissal decisionCoramBYRAM ONGAYA
Claimant is awarded Kshs. 238, 000 in compensation for the unfair dismissal, including Kshs. 17, 000 in lieu of notice, Kshs. 17, 000 for February 2014, and Kshs. 204, 000 in compensation for the unjustified termination.

Facts

Claimant was dismissed on March 6, 2014, without notice or a hearing, and did not receive his salary or untaken leave pay. He filed a lawsuit on April 20, 2015.

Issues

  • Unlawful and unfair dismissal
  • Compensation for unfair dismissal
  • Payment of untaken leave and overtime
  • Payment of salary for February 2014

Reasoning

The dismissal was found to be unlawful and unfair due to lack of due notice and a hearing, and the lack of a genuine reason for termination. The claimant was awarded compensation for the unjustified termination and for the days worked but not paid.

Outcome

Claimant wins

Orders

  • The respondent to pay the claimant a sum of Kshs. 238, 000 by 01.07.2019
  • The respondent to pay the claimant's costs of the suit

Remedies

  • Compensation for unjustified dismissal
  • Lump sum payment for untaken leave and salary for February 2014

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Employment Act, 2007
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case