SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Joseph Oduor Otieno v National Bank of Kenya Limited [2019] KEELRC 1483 (KLR)

[2019] KEELRC 1483 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
1483
Citation
[2019] KEELRC 1483 (KLR)
Decided
28 May 2019
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeWrongful and Unfair TerminationPostureAppealCoramHON. LADY JUSTICE HELLEN WASILWA
Holding

The termination of the Claimant's employment was unfair and unjustified due to lack of valid reasons and due process.

Facts

The Claimant was employed by the Respondent from April 1, 2008, and was offered loan facilities. In 2014, the Respondent introduced a voluntary early retirement plan, which the Claimant did not accept. On August 24, 2015, the Respondent suspended the Claimant for investigations into alleged fraudulent activities, reducing his salary. The Claimant was terminated on November 13, 2015, without a hearing.

Issues

  1. Fair termination procedure
  2. Validity of termination reasons

Reasoning

The court found that the Claimant was not given notice of the hearing and was not asked to call his witnesses, indicating a lack of fair hearing. The termination was based on fraudulent activities, which the Claimant denied.

Outcome

Awarded 8 months' salary as compensation for unfair termination and 1 month's salary in lieu of notice.

Orders

  • Award 8 months' salary as compensation for unfair termination
  • Award 1 month's salary in lieu of notice
  • Direct Respondent to issue Claimant with a Certificate of Service
  • Respondent to pay costs of the suit plus interest at Court rates

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Employment Act 2007
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case