SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kenya Union of Commercial, Food and Allied Workers v Del Monte (K) Ltd [2019] KEELRC 1617 (KLR)

[2019] KEELRC 1617 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
1617
Citation
[2019] KEELRC 1617 (KLR)
Decided
20 May 2019
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeLabour DisputePostureAppeal from the original trialCoramNzioki wa Makau
The termination was fair and the Grievant is entitled to Kshs. 10,000/- for the days worked and Kshs. 19,793.76 for pro rata leave.

Facts

The Grievant, Gerald Okiri Ogubi, was employed by Del Monte (K) Ltd as a seasonal employee earning Kshs. 137/= per hour. He was transferred to the weighbridge department and worked there for 4 years. Allegedly, he accepted a bribe from a customer to let her leave with excess pineapple pulp.

Issues

  • Unfair termination of employment
  • Payment in lieu of notice
  • Compensation for days worked
  • Pro rata leave
  • Costs of the suit

Reasoning

Due procedure was followed, and the Grievant was given a chance to explain his side. The Respondent proved the reason for the termination and followed fair procedure.

Outcome

Allowed to this extent

Orders

  • Kshs. 10,000/- for the days worked
  • Kshs. 19,793.76 pro rata leave
  • Kshs. 20,000/- costs of the suit

Remedies

  • Interest on the sums in a) and b) at court rates above from the date of filing suit till payment in full
  • The sums in a) and b) above to be subjected to statutory deductions

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Employment Act
  • Labour Relations Act
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case