SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kenya Engineering Workers Union v Wika Industries Limited [2019] KEELRC 1850 (KLR)

[2019] KEELRC 1850 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
1850
Citation
[2019] KEELRC 1850 (KLR)
Decided
10 April 2019
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLabour Relations DisputePostureClaimant won the caseCoramByram Ongaya
Holding

The court declared that the claimant is entitled to recognition by the respondent and ordered the parties to conclude the relevant recognition agreement within 14 days and thereafter negotiate a collective bargaining agreement. The respondent was ordered to deduct and remit union dues for its employees being members of the claimant and the deductions to start not later than the end of April, 2019. The respondent was also ordered to pay part of the claimant's costs of the suit.

Facts

The claimant, Kenya Engineering Workers Union, alleged that the respondent, Wika Industries Limited, refused to sign a recognition agreement. The claimant claimed to have recruited all unionisable employees and sought a declaration of recognition and a collective bargaining agreement.

Issues

  1. Recognition of the claimant as the correct sector union
  2. Recruitment of unionisable employees
  3. Deduction of union dues

Reasoning

The court found that the claimant had recruited all unionisable employees in the respondent's establishment and there was no dispute that the claimant is the correct sector union.

Outcome

Claimant won

Orders

  • Recognition agreement to be signed within 14 days
  • Deduction of union dues to start by end of April, 2019
  • Payment of part of the claimant's costs of the suit

Remedies

  • Recognition of the claimant as the correct sector union
  • Recruitment of unionisable employees
  • Deduction of union dues

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Labour Relations Act, 2007
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.0 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case