SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Augustus Masyuki Mbaluka v Kenya Kazi Security Limited [2019] KEELRC 208 (KLR)

[2019] KEELRC 208 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
208
Citation
[2019] KEELRC 208 (KLR)
Decided
5 December 2019
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeEmployment DisputePostureClaimant's Claim for Gratuity, Unpaid Salary, Salary in Lieu of Notice, Severance Pay, and CostsCoramRichard M. Makori
The dismissal was wrongful and unfair due to the lack of solid basis for determining the Claimant's culpability without the full outcome of investigations.

Facts

Claimant was employed by Respondent from February 28, 2001, and was dismissed on September 17, 2013, for negligence in duty performance. The incident involved an attack on the yard, and the Claimant was suspended before dismissal.

Issues

  • Whether the dismissal was lawful and fair
  • Whether the Claimant is entitled to the remedies sought

Reasoning

The dismissal was based on negligence of duty, but the Respondent rushed to a conclusion without solid evidence, leading to a wrongful and unfair dismissal.

Outcome

The dismissal was found to be wrongful and unfair.

Remedies

  • Gratuity for 152 months
  • Unpaid salary for 12 days worked in September 2013
  • 1 month's salary in lieu of notice
  • Severance pay for 152 months
  • Costs plus interest

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Employment Act, 2007
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case