SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Bungoma County Public Service Board & 6 others v Governor, County Government of Bungoma & 3 others [2019] KEELRC 2332 (KLR)

[2019] KEELRC 2332 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
2332
Citation
[2019] KEELRC 2332 (KLR)
Decided
1 February 2019
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeLabor RelationsPostureAppeal from a decision of the Employment & Labour Relations CourtCoramPresiding Judge
The court found that the Respondents do not have the constitutional and legal authority to remove the Petitioners from office.

Facts

The Petitioners were appointed as chairman and members of the Bungoma County Public Board on a six-year contract. The Interested Party filed a petition seeking their removal, which was heard by the 2nd Respondent's committee on Public Service and ICT.

Issues

  • Whether the Respondents have the constitutional and legal authority to remove the Petitioners from office.
  • If the authority is granted, whether the removal process followed legal and procedural requirements.
  • Whether the Petitioners are entitled to the reliefs sought.

Reasoning

The court ruled that the Respondents' actions were not in accordance with the Constitution, County Governments Act, and Employment Act.

Outcome

The Petitioners' appeal was dismissed.

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • County Governments Act
  • Employment Act
  • Constitution of Kenya
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case