SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Mwaniki Silas Ngari v Kisii University [2019] KEELRC 2422 (KLR)

[2019] KEELRC 2422 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
2422
Citation
[2019] KEELRC 2422 (KLR)
Decided
31 January 2019
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeConstructive DismissalPostureAppeal from the original trialCoramPresiding Judge
The court found that the respondent’s actions since 21.8.2013 did not amount to attempted constructive unlawful dismissal of the claimant's contract.

Facts

The claimant was employed as an Associate Professor by Egerton University and later appointed as Deputy Principal Academic Affairs (DPAA) by Kisii University College, which became a constituent college of Egerton University. The Universities Act 2012 repealed the previous Acts and re-established the universities, leading to the redundancy of the DPAA position. The claimant was appointed Acting Deputy Vice Chancellor Academic Affairs (DVCAA) but was later directed to hand over the office to the substantive DVCAA.

Issues

  • Whether the respondent breached or unlawfully constructively terminated the claimant’s contract of employment
  • Whether the respondent violated the claimant’s constitutional rights between August 2013 and 31.10.2015
  • Whether the claimant is entitled to the reliefs sought

Reasoning

The court ruled that the respondent's actions were not in breach of the contract or constructive dismissal, and the contract was frustrated by an operation of the law.

Outcome

Affirmed

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Universities Act 2012
  • Kisii University College Order 2007
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case